The guys at Geeks are sexy posted a really beautiful mesh up obtained via Cubiclebot .
Here it is.

Welcome back to the third article of this mini series on skill assessment management (first two can be found here and here ).
As I already mentioned, skill assessment is not a simple business for many reasons:
So here follow some of the tips deriving from experience that will for sure help you succeed:
Next time we will speak about some of the skills that at general level are the most common to be measured.
After the first set of articles (you can find references here) on how to evaluate people potential, let’s now move to the world of “skills”.
The freedictionary defines skill as “Proficiency, facility, or dexterity that is acquired or developed through training or experience”.
This means that, despite you have people working with you on a daily basis, they may have built during their professional experience abilities that represent and define them as a fingerprint.
Though representing a valuable asset, this talents have different weight on your working context, because part can be useful and part not.
So what is important is to have a mapping of skills, crafted to what you need to run your business. And after having acquired the situation in terms of existing and gap toward the desired state, since skills are addressable through experience and training, you can design a plan to address this gap.
But let’s start from the beginning.
What is a skill assessment?
On a “definition basis”, is the process through which you are going to map skills, expressed through actions and behaviors, owned by a person, and map them toward a desired state.
On an “opportunity basis” a way to better know you people and define how and at which risk/cost you can craft your organization
What a skill assessment is not?
A skill assessment is not an hidden evaluation of people, nor a judgement on their personal behavior.
A skill assessment is not a performance evaluation or a way to evaluate potential.
Some preliminary thoughts
As usual we will go in depth through the different steps to have a successful assessment, but some preliminary considerations are worth sharing.
Jeff Magee at his site describes the SMART(c) methodology for managing the meeting the right way.
Essentially the method focuses on being:
I had my personal comment:
Be sure the set:
This comments also here
We covered in previous articles some different topics of people potential evaluation (Article 1, Article 2 and Article 3).
What we are going to deep dive now is the king of all tools: the assessment.
First of all let’s define what this kind of meeting is and which are the main points:
As I said before, the assessment day is not something you can take out of your hat in 10 minutes: it needs practice and experience to be managed in an effective way.
The key points to conduct a good assessment are:
What to measure.
Of course meeting people for the sole pleasure of watching is not the aim of this kind of event, so we need to understand what should be assessed.
Unfortunately there’s no general rule to determine what to focus more on, since potential evaluation should be crafted for each situation, but as a general rule of thumb you should consider covering at least this areas:
Some tips to conduct the assessment:
We covered in a previous article which is the starting point for evaluating people potential. Now we will focus on which are the objectives and tools that can be used.
Why is it important to assess people potential:
To go through a good potential assessment, please take in mind that is a step different and even more complex from performance evaluation:
Stated this objectives, is it clear to understand that tools (in a broad sense) play an important role.
So which are the best tools to be used during the assessment?
Here are my tips:
Next time we will focus on expected output and dimensions to be covered
Let’s start from an assumption: people are your best asset in any case, since you as a manager rely on their expertise and performance to achieve your result.
So, among manager tasks, choosing right people and identifying those with best attitudes is a key task both for their and your career.
What is performance evaluation? More or less simply is assessing you people in order to identify those with better skills and attitudes. Said in a more “professional” way is an assessment of people potential in terms of attitudes, skills, knowledge, flexibility to determine their ability to deal with more complex and different tasks.
Assessing people can start from different points, but main source is your direct observation. Of course is a complex matter if your team is big or your role gives you a line of managers, but you can bypass this limitation through a structured process: the more you can get similar informations, the more you will have a consistent situation to work on.
Some tips follow:
In consulting and companies presentation software like Microsoft Powerpoint is a crucial tool most of the times abused.
Creating an effective presentation is a complex task that should be approached with intelligence and method
Some tips:
In building your career you, for sure, should go through having some specific skills.
But this is not enough, because you should be confident in yourself, your means and your potential.
The bad news is that if you are not self confident by nature, building confidence is not easy things and goes through a personal “trip” more than a professional one.
The good news is that the achievements go beyond the professional sphere and are worth the effort.
There are some key points you can focus on:
Training isn’t a one way communication, both during the training and after it is finished.
And it’s an important moment of growth also for faculty and team behind the course.
To help in improving quality of course, it is useful to have also trainer perspective to be processed at a later time to better understand course results.
What follows is an example that can be customized at will:
Training evaluation form
Course name: ________________________________
Trainer name(s) ________________________________
Participants attitude toward course contents:
Notes _______________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________
Prevalent type of interventions during training:
Notes _______________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________
Prevailing attitude toward training:
Notes _______________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________
Prevailing acceptance toward training content and messages:
Notes _______________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________
Prevailing perception and attitude toward tests and workgroups:
Notes _______________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________
Recent Comments